Commentary‎ > ‎


About the election of 2016

The travesty of the electoral college system subverting the will of the majority of American voters in 2016 (and 2000) is particularly disheartening. Had the situation been reversed (the Democrats winning the electoral college and Republicans taking the popular vote), I would probably feel different, but that has not happened either this century or the last century. The discrepancy in the 2016 election was the largest ever: Clinton received almost three million more votes (65,853,516 to 62,984,825) making it a popular vote lead of 2.1%. United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote:

It was refreshing in contrast to what's going on in the USA to see that Italy was considering disruptive overhaul of the Constitution. From article in The NY Times, The referendum would change 47 of the Constitution’s 139 articles: Among the most significant changes would be provisions to alter the composition of Parliament, the way laws are passed and the balance of power between the central government and the country’s 20 regions, in areas like infrastructure and food safety.   Too bad the referendum did not succeed.

The photos of Hillary Clinton in this article ...caught my attention---she seems truly happy...happier than I've seen her in a long time.  Like a burden's been lifted. Of course, she's probably as freaked out as the rest of us progressives over where the USA is going. [image-copy]

With the 45th president's attack on Syria and threats to North Korea, the issue of authority to take military action against a sovereign nation without Congress declaring war arose. Congress has declared war 11 times in the history of the USA (as of April 2017):
WWII: 1942 Jun 4 - Rumania, Hungary, and Bulgaria; 1941 Dec11 - Italy, Germany; Dec 8 - Japan
WWI:  1917 - Austria-Hungary, Germany
1898: Kingdom of Spain
1846: Mexico
1812: Great Britain

2001 Sep 8 was the day Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF), but that was not a declaration of war on a sovereign state.

2017 Nov 12. Trump’s Trade Policy Is Lifting Exports. Of Canadian Lobster. By Ana Swanson, The New York Times. Excerpt: ...Gidney Fisheries is truly global, with its lobsters landing on plates in Paris and Shanghai through trade agreements hammered out in far-off capitals. ...A new trade agreement between Canada and the European Union has slashed tariffs on imports of Canadian lobsters. That means more 747s filled with Christmas-red crustaceans will depart from Nova Scotia for European markets this winter — and more revenue will flow to Gidney Fisheries. ...The Trump administration has adopted a skeptical view of trade deals, promising to scrap or renegotiate global agreements that it believes put American companies and workers at a disadvantage. Among them is the North American Free Trade Agreement, which the United States is trying to renegotiate. ...Some trade experts, though, say America’s get-tough approach is dissuading foreign partners from jumping into talks. Other countries, like Canada, are forging ahead with their own trade deals as they balk at the tough terms the United States is demanding in its trade negotiations. Over the weekend, a group of 11 countries including Canada announced that they were committed to moving ahead with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a sweeping multinational trade deal negotiated by the Obama administration. As these deals progress, American companies, particularly exporters, are finding themselves on the losing end of global trade as their competitors abroad gain easier access to foreign markets. ...It’s a historic shift for the United States, which has long led the charge for free trade and open markets. ...When Americans think about lobster, Maine often comes to mind. But Nova Scotia has emerged as a fierce competitor in exporting lobsters, particularly to Europe. Last year, American lobstermen sold only slightly more to Europe than their Canadian counterparts. That balance could soon shift given the Canadian-European trade pact, which eliminated an 8 percent European tariff on live lobster when it went into effect in September. ...The elimination of European tariffs is “the single most challenging issue” for the American lobster industry, said Annie Tselikis, the executive director of the Maine Lobster Dealers’ Association, ...“This trade agreement does give Canada a huge leg up in the European marketplace,” she said. Ms. Tselikis said the pact was encouraging American companies to invest in new facilities in Canada to qualify for the lower European tariff. “If the argument is you’re not going to develop this trade policy because you’re worried about outsourcing jobs — well, here we are, potentially outsourcing jobs due to an absence of trade policy,” she said....